Chicago Public Radio
Now Playing

12:00am BBC World Service
4:00am Smart City
  View Schedule


Pledge Now

There are many ways to support public radio.
Submit
Pledge Now
Events
11.21.2009 7th Annual DIY Trunkshow
11.22.2009 The Warrior Poetry Project: A Concert Reading of Poems by Veterans
View full calendar
revolution in access
Feder Blog
Submit
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • unknown
City RoomTM Public Affairs coverage from our award-winning staff
Business
Lawmaker Targets ‘Dead Peasants’ Insurance




 
 
Bookmark and Share Share
 

Rep. Luis Gutiérrez (D-Chicago) says his bill might push companies to invest more in employee health. (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari)

Imagine your spouse is a janitor or teller at a bank. Now imagine she passes away and you find out the bank took out a life-insurance policy on her. But the bank isn’t sharing the payout with you. A documentary film that opens nationwide Friday is reviving a debate about employer-owned life insurance. A Congressman from Chicago says the film inspired legislation that would prohibit such insurance on all but top-paid employees.

Until the 1980s, companies could take out life-insurance policies only on key personnel. Then many states started allowing employer-owned insurance on rank-and-file workers. That coverage became known in business circles as janitors insurance or even dead-peasants insurance.

Buying this coverage and borrowing against it helped hundreds of large firms generate billions of dollars in tax breaks. They also got a stream of tax-free death benefits.

MOORE: It’s actually their best interest not to provide you with health insurance.

Michael Moore slams employer-owned life insurance in his new film, “Capitalism: A Love Story.” He spoke in Chicago after an advance screening.

MOORE: Statistics show that those without the health insurance will die three to five years ahead of people with health insurance. They can actually rig the system through unsafe working conditions -- overworked, overstressed -- all that stuff feeds into making sure that maybe you won’t live as long. They’re going to collect on you.

In the late 1990s, the IRS began challenging some of the tax deductions. But Houston-based attorney Michael Myers says firms found new ways to deduct income from life insurance on employees.

MYERS: The fact that many companies do it doesn’t make it legitimate.

A 2006 federal law requires employers to get the worker’s permission. But Myers says many firms skip that step

MYERS: Every lawsuit I’ve had has involved a situation where there was no consent.

It’s hard to find out just how many employers carry the so-called dead-peasants insurance and how much the assets are worth.

The cash value of policies on bank workers is public. Bank of America reported that its total as of June 30 was $17.4 billion. Next was the Wells Fargo subsidiary Wachovia with $12.1 billion.

Spokespersons for Bank of America and Wachovia declined to speak on tape for this story. Both sent statements saying the income from the policies helps defray the cost of employee benefits.

FAILLA: What assurance we have of that, I’m not certain.

New York-based attorney John Failla advises companies about the insurance.

FAILLA: I just know based on my own experience, both in addressing coverage matters under these programs and in reviewing the various disclosures on these programs, that the overwhelming purpose for them is to enhance the ability to provide more fulsome benefits for employees.

But Rep. Luis Gutiérrez (D-Chicago) is raising a red flag. He chairs the U.S. House Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit.

This week Gutiérrez introduced a bill that would ban employer-owned life insurance unless the worker earns at least a million dollars a year from the company. He presented the legislation Wednesday on the House floor.

GUTIERREZ: In a nation where millions of full-time workers have no health insurance, maybe if we prevent companies from betting on the death of their employees, they’ll invest in the health of their employees.

For violations, the bill would provide civil and criminal remedies.

Leave a comment
Mike Sloothaak, West Lafayette, Indiana // Thursday, October 01, 2009 @ 1:39 PM

What shocked me is that our corporate tax law has become so convoluted that this scam would provide an income for the corporation. And let's be clear it's a scam. How can one (banking) company pay money (premiums) to another (insurance) company and still come out with a profit? Insurance companies-- like casinos-- always win in the long run. Why why why do we need tax code that encourages this?

Support Provided By


Become a Sponsor
Support Provided By


Become a Sponsor
Local News
Killing in Puerto Rico Hits Chicagoans Hard

Despite Rebuke, Burris 'Pleased' Senate Inquiry Over

Illinois Looking to Catch Up on Medicaid Payments

School Gives Special Ed Kids A Different Test, and Scores Soar

Oprah Counts Down to the End

Asian Carp Breach Barrier

Latest Unemployment Numbers Bad for Chicago Area, But There May Be Reason for Hope



National News
Moderate Dems pivotal in Saturday health care vote

Levin: May be more troubling emails from Hasan

US to drop shooting case against Blackwater guard

GOP: Health test recommendations could affect care

Police: NC girl raped, killed on day she was taken

Calif. launches probe into scam targeting churches

Researcher: Faint writing seen on Shroud of Turin



International News
Blast near aid office wounds 1 in NW Pakistan

6 world powers press Iran on nuclear issue

China says 31 dead, 82 trapped in mine explosion

Buddhists from 2 Koreas to hold joint ceremony

Bangladeshi mom want twins to stay in Australia

Chavez praises Carlos the Jackal

Campaigner against hate crimes killed in Moscow

Researcher: Faint writing seen on Shroud of Turin

Museum: Galileo's fingers, tooth are found

Argentina forces dirty war orphans to provide DNA