Comments Send Print Share Recommend Tweet Donald Vance v Donald Rumsfeld April 16, 2007 By: Steve Edwards Download Story Donald Vance and Nathan Ertel claim they were held against their will for days on end, without being charged with any crime and without having access to a lawyer. They say it was all because they were trying to blow the whistle on corruption. Comments Send Print Share Recommend Tweet View the discussion thread. Top Headlines On WBEZ.org How to survive a Chicago winter Chewing the Fat with Monica Eng and Louisa Chu Exoneree Diaries: Antione’s pay day How do kids like the new CPS lunches? Strange Brews Podcast Woman scarred by orphanage Remembering the 'Forgotten Hoosiers' What’s street cleaning really good for? What can Englewood learn from the new Detroit Whole Foods?