Your NPR news source

Here's What People are Saying About Barbie's Diversity Makeover

Mattel is rethinking how the Barbie brand could represent women of all colors, shapes, and sizes. Some are buying it. Others, not so much.

SHARE Here's What People are Saying About Barbie's Diversity Makeover
The latest Mattel Barbie dolls created to increase representation and diversity. (Courtesy of Mattel)

Last week, Mattel announced that Barbie is getting a makeover. A whole bunch of them, in fact. As last week, 33 new Barbie dolls are available for purchase through the website, in three new body types — petite, tall, and curvy — and seven skin tones, 22 eye colors, and 14 “face sculpts.” We rounded up some sharp thoughts on this news, ranging from what this means for Mattel’s bottom line to whether an widely hyped debut of Barbie’s new looks is really a step forward.

Over at The Atlantic, Megan Garber says the move is smart business strategy on Mattel’s part, given its past four years of sales declines. Given that the company’s 2015 line of racially diverse dolls, called the Fashionistas, seemed to help, this latest move seems like a good bet. Here’s Garber:

Mattel’s expansion of Barbie’s look...represents the basic, hopeful idea that diversity is valuable not just for diversity’s sake (or, as Anna Holmes recently put it, as a kind of grudging obligation). Diversity is—much more pragmatically, much more transformatively — good business. If consumers can see themselves in their dolls, Mattel has calculated, they will be more likely to purchase those dolls.

An essay by Bene Viera of Fusion suggests that for a lot of families, the politics of playtime are real, and deserve to be taken seriously. She recalls the lengths her mother went through to pick out her toys:

Although the original waifish, blonde hair blue-eyed Barbie reigned supreme on toy store shelves, I only had black Barbies. This was very important to my mother, so important that if a store didn’t have any black Barbies she would drive to another that did. She never explained why — and I never asked — but as an adult I understand that she knew it was crucial for me, a black girl coming of age in the 90s, to own dolls that looked like me. I am thankful she was proactive in making sure I saw myself reflected in the dolls I played with. Because whether people want to admit it or not, toys do shape how children view themselves.

Over at Jezebel, Kelly Faircloth brings up an interesting point: what if giving a curvy Barbie to a chubby child ends up doing more harm than good?

It’s unquestionably positive for girls to see a wider array of skin colors and body types represented positively. A more diverse Barbie is a good thing. But it’s impossible to separate my personal response to this development from the fact that I was a Barbie-loving chubby child, and — as Time alludes to — my reaction to being singled out with a gift of the “curvy” Barbie might very well have been absolute devastation.

Following Eliana Docketerman’s exclusive interview with Mattel in Time on the new Barbies, Jill Filipovic, also at Time, steps back to ask a bigger picture question — whether the dolls are skinny or curvy, white or brown, are we really okay with what the Barbie brand represents?

One pointy-toed step forward, though, is hardly a giant leap for womankind. Barbie is a literally objectified woman, not a superhero or an action figure but a plastic lady notable because she’s pretty. And she remains a quintessential ‘girls’ toy,’ Patient Zero in the pinkification pandemic that has infected toy stores for two generations and now prominently segregates ‘girls’ toys’ (Dolls, Arts & Crafts and Bath, Beauty & Accessories on, for example) from ‘boys’ toys’ (Action Figures, Video Games, Bikes & Ride-ons).

Speaking of representation and toys, Lego also took steps towards increased diversity last week, unveiling a new figurine that uses a wheelchair. Unlike the hoopla around Barbie’s new look, Lego was pretty low-key about its new toy, and Morwenna Jones atThe Independent compares the two approaches:

But unlike Barbie’s new range, unveiled with an exclusive in TIME magazine and more press embargoes than Barbie has convertibles, Lego’s latest character was simply placed in the middle of a busy park scene, sitting in his wheelchair as if it were the most natural thing in the world. As other companies make grand, sweeping gestures towards their commitment to diversity, it’s this that might just be the biggest step forwards.

— via NPR
The Latest
Liesl Olson started as director at The Jane Addams Hull-House Museum earlier this month. She joins WBEZ to talk about her future plans for this landmark of Chicago history. Host: Melba Lara; Reporter: Lauren Frost
The city faces criticism for issuing red light camera tickets at intersections where yellow lights fall slightly short of the city’s 3-second policy. And many traffic engineers say the lights should be even longer.
There was a time Chicago gave New York a run for its money. How did we end up the Second City?
Union Gen. Gordon Granger set up his headquarters in Galveston, Texas, and famously signed an order June 19, 1865, “All slaves are free.” President Biden made Juneteenth a federal holiday last year.
As the U.S. celebrates the second federal holiday honoring Juneteenth, several myths persist about the origins and history about what happened when enslaved people were emancipated in Texas.