Your NPR news source

Justice Department Threatens To Sue Harvard In Admissions Probe

The investigation is looking into claims that its admissions policies discriminate against white and Asian-American applicants by holding them to higher standards than black and Latino applicants.

SHARE Justice Department Threatens To Sue Harvard In Admissions Probe

The Department of Justice has opened a probe into the role of race in Harvard University’s admissions policies and is threatening to sue unless Harvard turns over documents by a Dec. 1 deadline, according to correspondence obtained by NPR.

The investigation is looking into allegations that the elite university’s admissions policies discriminate against white and Asian-Americans seeking admission by holding them to higher standards than black and Latino applicants. These are claims also made in a 2014 federal court case filed by the anti-affirmative action group Students for Fair Admissions, which remains pending.

“Harvard has publicly stated that its admissions policies and ongoing efforts to enroll a racially and economically diverse student body are in compliance with the 1964 Civil Rights Act,” reports NPR’s Claudio Sanchez. “Title VI of that law prohibits federally funded institutions from discriminating on the basis of race, color or national origin.”

A Nov. 17 letter from the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division says that the U.S. has determined that Harvard is “not complying with its Title VI access requirements.” Another letter from the same division says that in the two months since the initial request for information, “Harvard has pursued a strategy of delay and has not yet produced even a single document.”

The Justice Department is seeking “broad-ranging access to documents regarding Harvard’s admissions policy and practices.” It criticizes Harvard’s questioning of why the Civil Rights Division is involved in the matter, saying it was delegated by the Department.

Earlier correspondence from Harvard’s lawyer to the Justice Department obtained by NPR suggests the university’s skepticism about the probe.

"[T]he opening of an investigation in the current circumstances is, to our understanding, so outside ordinary practices that Harvard is obliged to clarify the authority and rationale for the Department’s decision,” Harvard lawyer Seth Waxman’s letter reads.

He states that the complaint at the core of this investigation is two and a half years old, and is “even more unusual because, as you know, identical issues are being litigated in federal court.”

As Kirk Carapezza reported for NPR, when the complaint was made initially “the Obama administration dismissed the claim without evaluating its merit” due to the pending lawsuit.

In August when the probe was confirmed, legal experts told Carapezza that they were skeptical about the allegations of race-based discrimination:

“ ‘It seems entirely consistent with President Trump’s campaign rhetoric,’ says Tomiko Brown-Nagin, a constitutional law professor at Harvard. Brown-Nagin points out that the Trump administration’s decision to target affirmative action policies comes as racial tensions are rising on many campuses. “ ‘On the one hand, you have racial minorities, immigrants who are concerned about certain dynamics on campus,’ she says. ‘On the other hand, you have conservatives who feel like their voices are being shut down in debates over things like affirmative action and immigration and sexual assault.’”

Waxman stated in a Nov. 7 letter that Harvard was willing to provide the Justice Department with documents produced for the federal court case, “with redactions for relevance, privacy, and privilege/work product protection.”

In the Nov. 17 letter, the Justice Department rejected the access plan as “impractical and unnecessary,” saying it improperly limited its right to review the information. It stressed that it is not subject to redaction requirements and would not allow “entities under investigation to dictate what information qualifies as relevant to the investigation.”

In a statement to NPR, Department of Justice spokesman Devin O’Malley said it “takes seriously any potential violation of an individual’s civil and constitutional rights, but we will not comment at this time.”

Harvard said in a statement that it will comply with its Title VI obligations. “In the process, we have an obligation to protect the confidentiality of student and applicant files and other highly sensitive records, and we have been seeking to engage the Department of Justice in the best means of doing so.”

Last year the Supreme Court upheld affirmative action in college admissions decisions, saying that race can be one factor in order to promote diversity on campus.

The Wall Street Journal suggests that there are “many potential outcomes” to the probe:

“One possibility is that it could lead to litigation in court between the Justice Department and Harvard. In that case, if a federal judge finds that Harvard has violated Title VI, the court has broad authority to issue a remedy, such as ordering the university to change its admissions policies, experts say.”

Copyright 2017 NPR. To see more, visit
The Latest
The four Northwestern educators are charged with obstructing police during the protest. Those arrested questioned the timing, and the potential chilling effect on academic freedom.
School officials say separating students from their phones can help curb classroom distractions and cyberbullying.
The tension around taking on debt and the pension payment was the crux of a month-long delay of the school system’s budget proposal, which came out Wednesday.
CPS officials say cuts to staffing and other areas, among other initiatives, are needed to balance the budget this month. It’s unclear what path Johnson might take to fill the hole.
Northeastern Illinois University allows working adults to showcase their skills and earn a degree but financial limitations blunt the impact.