Your NPR news source

Why Mitt’s Bain exit date matters

Did Mitt Romney leave Bain Capital in 1999, or later, perhaps as late as 2002? Achy Obejas argues that the answer matters for several reasons.

SHARE Why Mitt’s Bain exit date matters
When did Mitt stay and when did he go?

When did Mitt stay and when did he go?

AP/Carlos Osorio, File

When did Mitt stay and when did he go? (AP/Carlos Osorio, File)

FILE - In this May 8, 2012 file photo, Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney speaks in Lansing, Mich. Looks like President Barack Obama’s allies got the hint. An independent group with deep ties to the Democrat’s re-election campaign rolls out a TV ad assailing Mitt Romney over business practices at Bain Capital _ just 24 hours after Obama himself opened the same line of attack. It’s a sign of the new world of campaign finance, where super PACs have wide leeway (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio, File)

Carlos Osorio/ASSOCIATED PRESS

Did Mitt Romney leave Bain Capital in 1999, or later, perhaps as late as 2002? The answer matters for a couple of reasons:

1. Bain outsourced thousands of U.S. jobs overseas after 1999 — which Romney, understandably, would like not to be associated with. If Romney wasn’t around after 1999, he can say his hands are clean (though he continued to earn profits from Bain stock and investments up until ... er, right now ... ). But if Romney had any say at all and he didn’t veto or register opposition to the outsourcing deals, his silence would imply consent.

2. There is a discrepancy between what Romney and his surrogates are saying now (adviser Ed Gillespie said recently that Romney had “retired retrospectively” to 1999 after working in some capacity for Bain in 2001 and 2002) and what either Romney, or someone who signed his name, told the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2000, 2001 and 2002 when he was listed as CEO, president and sole owner of Bain.

How can anyone be CEO, president and sole stockholder of a company, receive a salary, and still claim to have had no formal involvement with it?

Let’s say this discrepancy doesn’t bother you, that you’re willing to believe that “CEO” and other titles (though that stockholding is way more than just a title, no matter how you look at it) are just formalities, that you buy that no one from Bain ever called Romney for a bit of advice, that Romney just walked away from a company he’d founded and made successful without once looking back or worrying about a decision made by others which he didn’t like.

Let’s say you believe the SEC documents are the result of carelessness (not exactly great for your guy, but better that than he deliberately misrepresented himself before the SEC, which, as you probably know by now, is a felony).

Explain then, please, the $100,000 Romney earned from Bain in 2001 and the other $100,000 he earned in 2002.

Here’s the kicker: That $200,000 is not dividend earnings or investment returns. It’s not a bonus. It’s pure salary.

Now, if I understand the word “salary” correctly — and, to make sure, I looked it up in my trusty Merriam-Webster — that means a “fixed compensation paid regularly for services.”

What were these services?

Either Romney provided a service and did something to earn the money, or Bain paid him for no reason.

And I don’t know about you but in my world, no one ever gets paid — $100,000! — to do literally nothing.

The Latest
It’s election day, and hundreds of teens are serving as election judges. The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments today in a case that could impact more than one million student people in Illinois with college debt. Local groups are stepping up to provide shelter for asylum seekers arriving in Chicago.